![]() ![]() That suggests that the structuring and designing are identical. Why? Because the speed index is related to the first contentful paint in both cases. The scores fluctuate per search but if you look at the data, then it’s obvious that Touch and mTouch are identical. There is a slightly better score for mTouch, but it suggests that the deviation is random and not caused by having an alternative structure. What does this mean? It means that the page speed of Touch is equal to mTouch. It has a total score of 88 with a speed index of 2.5, first contentful paint of 2.5, and a time to interactive of 2.9s. The second screenshot shows the statistics of mTouch. So, I inserted the links of both Touch and mTouch into Google Page Speed Insights. I decided to check whether or not my feeling was justified. However, today it feels like there isn’t anything between Facebook Touch or mTouch. MTouch was designed for mobile phones and optimized its speed to enable fast loading times. Facebook Touch vs Facebook mTouchīack in the day, there was a clear distinction between Touch and Facebook mTouch. No switching between apps, it works just like the desktop Facebook. It’s just not practical… With Touch, you can browse Facebook and chat with people at the same time. I never understood why Facebook made a Facebook app and a separate messenger. The other benefit of the Facebook Touch web version is convenience. By using the Facebook Touch web version you don’t store anything directly on your phone and this will save you memory and battery time. The Facebook app is a massive drainer of your mobile phone. The biggest pro of the web version vs the app is the usage of memory and battery. The old Touch app has disappeared and I suspect Facebook made it a priority to get rid of it. It lacked functionalities and the Touch app offered these.īut what about today? Is it still relevant? There is still a good argument to choose for Facebook Touch rather than the Facebook app. Nowadays the mobile version of Facebook is very good, but this wasn’t always the case. ![]() The idea was to make a Facebook version that was better designed for touchscreen devices like your mobile phone or tablet. ![]() Facebook Touch used to be a separate application for Facebook designed by a third-party developer called H5 Applications. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |